Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011100010… |
… | …0011100000000 |
3 | 10122012021010120 |
4 | 3013010130000 |
5 | 101324403312 |
6 | 5102300240 |
7 | 1202364240 |
oct | 307043400 |
9 | 118167116 |
10 | 52184832 |
11 | 27503267 |
12 | 15587680 |
13 | aa719cb |
14 | 6d05b20 |
15 | 48ac28c |
hex | 31c4700 |
52184832 has 144 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 168360192. Its totient is φ = 14008320.
The previous prime is 52184827. The next prime is 52184879. The reversal of 52184832 is 23848125.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (33) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 52184793 and 52184802.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 91107 + ... + 91677.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1169168).
Almost surely, 252184832 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 52184832, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (84180096).
52184832 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (116175360).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
52184832 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
52184832 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 614 (or 600 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 15360, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 52184832 is about 7223.9069761452. The cubic root of 52184832 is about 373.6928283225.
The spelling of 52184832 in words is "fifty-two million, one hundred eighty-four thousand, eight hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •