Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011111000110… |
… | …0010000010000 |
3 | 10110211000201000 |
4 | 2332030100100 |
5 | 100230420202 |
6 | 4540342000 |
7 | 1143532203 |
oct | 276142020 |
9 | 113730630 |
10 | 49857552 |
11 | 26163798 |
12 | 14844900 |
13 | a438614 |
14 | 689b93a |
15 | 459c91c |
hex | 2f8c410 |
49857552 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 144365760. Its totient is φ = 16473600.
The previous prime is 49857541. The next prime is 49857559. The reversal of 49857552 is 25575894.
49857552 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 98 + 5 + 7 + 552 = 666.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 49857498 and 49857507.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (49857559) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 56152 + ... + 57032.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1804572).
Almost surely, 249857552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 49857552, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (72182880).
49857552 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (94508208).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
49857552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
49857552 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1029 (or 1017 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 504000, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 49857552 is about 7060.9880328464. The cubic root of 49857552 is about 368.0529618167.
The spelling of 49857552 in words is "forty-nine million, eight hundred fifty-seven thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •