Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10101100101100001111001… |
… | …110101011010111101000000 |
3 | 110110010222120112102220022100 |
4 | 111211201321311122331000 |
5 | 44420431011244023302 |
6 | 533525525435510400 |
7 | 25666021113002421 |
oct | 2545417165327500 |
9 | 413128515386270 |
10 | 94938001157952 |
11 | 28282a86696a87 |
12 | a7937545b8400 |
13 | 40c87cc494534 |
14 | 196304933d648 |
15 | ae984e115d1c |
hex | 565879d5af40 |
94938001157952 has 84 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 273261227578560. Its totient is φ = 31513590296832.
The previous prime is 94938001157927. The next prime is 94938001157971. The reversal of 94938001157952 is 25975110083949.
94938001157952 is a `hidden beast` number, since 9 + 4 + 9 + 3 + 8 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 579 + 52 = 666.
94938001157952 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 94938001157952.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 344680158 + ... + 344955485.
Almost surely, 294938001157952 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
94938001157952 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (178323226420608).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
94938001157952 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
94938001157952 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 689635900 (or 689635887 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 24494400, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 94938001157952 in words is "ninety-four trillion, nine hundred thirty-eight billion, one million, one hundred fifty-seven thousand, nine hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •