Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100010010100111… |
… | …1001111011000100 |
3 | 22111221020210111020 |
4 | 3010221321323010 |
5 | 23224111210432 |
6 | 1303215511140 |
7 | 144521516160 |
oct | 30451717304 |
9 | 8457223436 |
10 | 3299319492 |
11 | 144341a627 |
12 | 780b284b0 |
13 | 407704671 |
14 | 23427dca0 |
15 | 1449bb22c |
hex | c4a79ec4 |
3299319492 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 8798185536. Its totient is φ = 942662688.
The previous prime is 3299319409. The next prime is 3299319493. The reversal of 3299319492 is 2949139923.
It is a happy number.
3299319492 is digitally balanced in base 2 and base 4, because in such bases it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×32993194922 = 21771018220582276128, which contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (3299319493) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 19638723 + ... + 19638890.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (366591064).
Almost surely, 23299319492 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3299319492 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (5498866044).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3299319492 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3299319492 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 39277627 (or 39277625 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 944784, while the sum is 51.
The square root of 3299319492 is about 57439.7030981185. The cubic root of 3299319492 is about 1488.7032081317.
The spelling of 3299319492 in words is "three billion, two hundred ninety-nine million, three hundred nineteen thousand, four hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •