Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001111000101110… |
… | …00000000101010100 |
3 | 111200220020112110111 |
4 | 10330113000011110 |
5 | 41332223124113 |
6 | 2234400532404 |
7 | 245346052450 |
oct | 47427000524 |
9 | 14626215414 |
10 | 5307629908 |
11 | 22840229a9 |
12 | 1041621104 |
13 | 6677cb519 |
14 | 384c9d660 |
15 | 210e7113d |
hex | 13c5c0154 |
5307629908 has 144 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 11939260032. Its totient is φ = 2014156800.
The previous prime is 5307629849. The next prime is 5307629923. The reversal of 5307629908 is 8099267035.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 18754735 + ... + 18755017.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (82911528).
Almost surely, 25307629908 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 5307629908, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (5969630016).
5307629908 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (6631630124).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5307629908 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5307629908 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 414 (or 381 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 816480, while the sum is 49.
The square root of 5307629908 is about 72853.4824699547. The cubic root of 5307629908 is about 1744.3496571351.
The spelling of 5307629908 in words is "five billion, three hundred seven million, six hundred twenty-nine thousand, nine hundred eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.030 sec. • engine limits •